Let's say that the standard for this will be: Anyone you've ever met who at least claims to be a White Supremacist.
"If there's no such thing as a stupid question then what kind of questions do stupid people ask"?
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
  Considerate: 34%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 48%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
So first it was "You commented on wanting to deny jobs to black people" and now it's "You stated that you think it's right AND fair to deny black people a job based on the color of their skin".
If either of these accusations were true, then you could cite them as they were allegedly stated by me on this site. Since you didn't...I'm left to my own personal knowledge of what I said as well as the absence of any proof. Looks like you're taking an abundance of personal liberty with what I actually said. You're welcome to continue to insist that I'm racist and I'll continue to call you out for repeatedly race baiting. There's not an expiration on the race card is there?
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Americanism not Globalism, will be our credo." ~Donald Trump
"A communist is like a crocodile" ~Winston Churchill
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 33%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Interestingly, I have never met a race supremacist in any of the First World countries. Japan is widely believed to be a nationalist and racist country, but what I personally found there throughout the 6 months I spent there was that Japanese were misunderstood. Most of them are not nationalists/racists, and they actually treat immigrants very well, like important and respect-worthy guests - but they are very defensive of their culture and are afraid of it being eroded throughout the interaction with foreign cultures. They are interested in cultural exchanges, but only as long as it enriches and not replaces their culture. It is a complex phenomenon, difficult to understand without having lived there.
In the US, I know that White supremacists exist, but they seem to be very rare on the Midwest, at least. What is somewhat more common is patriotism ("Buy American!", "Praise Jesus!", "Our country is the best in the world!"), which has similar roots, but, in my opinion, is less malicious - and even that is very rare. That said, Blacks tend to hang out with Blacks, Whites tend to hang out with Whites, Asians tend to hang out with Asians and so on, which is somewhat puzzling to me - but it is not really racism/nationalism, and, instead, is self-imposed segregation.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
You claim that it is okay to discriminate people based on their skin colour and specifically double and then truiple down, trying to justify your racism. The basis of equality is judging people by their actions, not their skin colour. You argue that we should judge people based on their skin colour and not their actions.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
You're welcome to misinterpret my statements however you'd like and in doing so I'll be happy to pocked the small victories from your trail of logical fallacies. Thanks for playing.
On a side note if you did want to see what it looks like when someone spews Racism and gets called out on it, you can look here:
Ampersand said:
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 59%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.2  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.2  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Also the posts clearly show you supporting discrimination. You are provided with a piece of peer reviewed scientific research that shows that when sent CVs which are otherwise identical apart from some having stereotypically black names are sent to employers, the stereotypically ethnic minority names receive less responses to a degree that is statistically significant to a scientific legal. You argue that because the black population at a whole has a higher rate of criminal offence than the white population, it is therefore completely valid to choose not to hire black people as statistically they are more likely to commit crimes. You rhetorically ask "If you're a White business owner and you're hiring for a new position and you know that a Black Person is 27 times more likely to attack a White Person than vice a versa... ...then would you refuse to take any of that into account when hiring a Black Person? " with you making it clear the answer should be no you wouldn't hire them.
This argument is based around the idea that rather than the employers rejecting black candidates who have a criminal record or other indications of criminal behaviour, employers should judge applicants based on their skin colour rather than as an individual and reject black applicants in favour of white ones. This is by definition racist. If you disagree feel free to actually present an evidence based argument rather than just complaining and dogding the point.
Lastly I'll just point out the logical fallaciousness of trying to argue that it wouldn't matter if you were racist in a conversation you had with someone else or the tu quoque fallacy where you think if someone else said something racist that would somehow mean you didn't say something racist.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.26  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.06  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.94  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
Guilt by association takes the form: "John is a con artist. John has black hair. Therefore, all people with black hair are con artists" which doesn't fit the structure of what I've said at all. If I said "Vaulk is a racist and right-wing, therefore all right-wing people are racists" that would be a guilt by association fallacy. You probably actually meant something like poisoning the well, although that wouldn't apply either because this is a topic about white supremacists and so you being a holocaust denying Hitler-apologist is pertinent to the topic and not an off-topic attempt to drag down your character as an attempt to avoid the argument - your racism IS the argument..
Also questioning historical events and being racist are not mutually exclusive so your defence there is irrelevant.
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.56  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.36  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
The second point is even easier to dismiss. Scroll to the top of the page. See the big title at the top. The title is "How many white supremacists do you know?". That is the topic and a Hitler apologist holocaust denier who thinks a Jewish conspiracy committed 9/11 should be a good candidate in anyone's book and it is therefore on topic.
Why is everyone except me so bad at understanding logical fallacies?
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.88  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
1) You hypocritically engaged in the same behaviour you now try to deplore; unless you think that because your claims of me being racist blew up in your face that somehow means your attempt should count.
2) Any normal person would consider racism as very much not "common decency" and "appropriate social discourse".
3) The evidence clearly show you are racist and you have been unable to offer a rebuttal.
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.04  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.66  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
"White supremacy or white supremacism is a racist ideology based upon the belief that white people are superior in many ways to people of other races and that therefore white people should be dominant over other races. White supremacy has roots in scientific racism and it often relies on pseudoscientific arguments. Like most similar movements such as neo-Nazism, white supremacists typically oppose members of other races as well as Jews."
And of course that argument is entirely in aid of helping you defend a Hitler apologist holocaust denier! It would be weird how you cared more about the technicalities of what classifies as white supremacism rather than holocaust denial if your racism weren't so obvious at this point.
As for the rest; you are trying to defend a white supremacist by "pointing out my errors" which so far consists of making up false claims about how white supremacists aren't racist and Jews aren't a group. Even if your argument weren't so lacking in any evidence whatsoever you would still be defending a white supremacist because defending a white supremacist and "pointing out errors" is not mutually exclusive, ergo your attempt at evading what you are doing fails.As for the guilt by association fallacy, I've already explained with evidence why that is ridiculous so you merely shooting your mouth off without evidence can be ignored because arguments are based on evidence like the kind I've been providing, not on how long someone can keep on spewing out rubbish.
Anyway back on ignore you go - your post here is kind of emblematic of your overall inability to form a coherent argument and why I find it a waste of time to engage with you. You think simply by making wild claims that automatically means you are right and your argument are valid. that's not how debates work and you need to back up your arguments with evidence and logic - hence why you'll never be able to counter my arguments which are evidence and logic supported and why it's a waste of time for me to engage you - from this point going forward it would just be you insisting you are right regardless of the proof and evidence and then me reiterating how arguments rely on proof rather than wild claims.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 7  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are idiotic racist scum. You're so idiotic you may have a legitimate mental health disorder and that is the cause of your racist beliefs and claims, but that you are racist is not up for debate.
  Considerate: 22%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 22%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.36  
  Sources: 8  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
You know at this point I'd invite anyone who disagrees with @Ampersand to take their turn coming in here to debate him so they too could be labeled a Racist. Seems we all are somehow racists and everyone's wrong except him. Must be nice to be infallible.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stupid".
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.36  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Just for the record, are you defender the the Holocaust denying Hitler defender and the person who states white supremacists aren't racist as well as yourself and your statements that employers should discriminate against black people due to their skin colour? Your clear and apparent racism being a detail you have been completely unable to rebuttal and that I have documented and fully explained with links to your racist statements?
  Considerate: 42%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.8  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
I was a Flat Earth Denier, called them Flattards, and here I am a Globetard supporting Flat Earth. Besides, @Erfisflat answered you with: Questioning historical events does not equal racism. I agree, that six million did pop up a lot before the Holocaust did it not?
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.3  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
http://www.renegadetribune.com/the-six-million-myth/
Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.
The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.
Wayne Dyer
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, I believe from all the historical evidence that Evolutionists are racist, and calling evolution science is a damn lie.
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.44  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
But were they persecuted, .. hated, .. that is for certain, and I know that first hand; My father hated the Jews (married my mom after the war to "blend in") so did every German family member I have, and Germans I worked with. Let's not forget the Russians, Croats, Hungarians hate Jews too, as do most of Europeans. So it's not about whether or not there was discrimination against Jews, and millions of them being rounded up and brutally murdered in Europe, which does and has existed since there were Jews. It's this 6,000,000 killed during WW2 that's in question, right? The Jews just love the number 6, even their star on their flag has two sixes, the two upside down triangles representing the "As Above, So Below" Satanic agenda!
Denying that the Jews were specifically picked out during WW2 would be, in my opinion also discrimination, because as far as I'm concerned is a fact that I know from first hand accounts, first hand stories, .. letters from non-Jews written in prison camps by Christ following Believers that were never published, and I heard first hand account stories from both sides.
I mean we could just as well deny the Holocaust of Negros which goes into hundreds of millions over the past few hundred years, and continues to this day by the same people that murdered the Jews, the Gypsies, and all those of darker skin, even the sick, .. and today, it's those collecting more than $600 a month Social Security by either black or white! S.S. is reserved for the SS!
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.16  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 66%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra